Downy Mildew Resistant Spinach Plant

ABSTRACT

The present invention relates to downy mildew, and especially downy mildew caused by the plant pathogen Peronospora farinosa, resistant spinach plants (Spinacia oleracea). The present spinach plants include a downy mildew resistance providing genomic fragment from Spinacia tetrandra. Specifically, the present invention relates to spinach plants being resistant to downy mildew, wherein the spinach plant includes a downy mildew resistance providing genomic fragment from Spinacia tetrandra such as spinach plants including in their genomes one or more nucleic acid sequences selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 3, SEQ ID No. 5, SEQ ID No. 7, SEQ ID No. 9, SEQ ID No. 11, SEQ ID No. 13, SEQ ID No. 15, SEQ ID No. 17, SEQ ID No. 19, SEQ ID No. 21, SEQ ID No. 23, SEQ ID No. 25, SEQ ID No. 27, SEQ ID No. 29, SEQ ID No. 31, SEQ ID No. 33 and SEQ ID No. 35.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is the United States national phase of International Application No. PCT/EP2019/063959 filed May 29, 2019, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to downy mildew, and especially downy mildew caused by the plant pathogen Peronospora farinosa, resistant spinach plants (Spinacia oleracea). The present spinach plants comprise a downy mildew resistance providing genomic fragment from Spinacia tetrandra. The present invention further relates to seeds and plant parts of the present plants, methods for providing, or identifying, the present plants and downy mildew resistance providing nucleic acid sequences.

Description of Related Art

Spinach is commercially grown worldwide for its attractive and nutritious leaves. In 2017, production of spinach was close to 28 million tons worldwide. Spinach (Spinacia oleracea) is a member of the Amaranthaceae family, subfamily Chenopodioideae. Other well-known family members include such plants as quinoa and beet. The latter is a cultivated plant of big importance for agriculture with sugar beet, red beet and Swiss chard as examples.

Regarding nutritional value, while providing only a small amount of calories (only 23 for 100 grams of cooked spinach), spinach is a rich source of vitamins A, B2 (or folate), B6, C, E and K; magnesium, manganese, calcium, potassium, iron and dietary fibre.

Spinach flowering is induced by (long) day length and under optimal conditions can reach even up to 4 generations in a year with a life cycle from seed to new harvest completed within 3 months. A bottleneck can be caused by seed dormancy.

Spinach is a wind pollinator and its pollen can reach far. A line is considered male if it converts from female or mixed flowering to (all) male flowering within a week. Female lines stay so for at least three weeks without producing any pollen. Hybrids of spinach can readily be produced making use of plants which have a female flowering phase and plants which have a male flowering phase as pollinator. Before the female plants develop male flowers, all female flowers are fertilized by the male plant. The setting of seeds occurs rapidly within 3 days and after that the ripening of the seed takes approximately a month.

Under optimal conditions commercial elite spinach lines are grown and harvested within 25 days to obtain baby leaf spinach.

Breeding resulted in spinach plants which are rapid growing without premature flowering. Older varieties tend to have narrower leaves and have a stronger, somewhat bitter taste; newer varieties have broader leaves and a milder taste. Also, recent types have little tendency for bolting in warm conditions and therefore will not prematurely flower and produce seeds.

Spinach is cultivated for the leaves. Commercial spinach can have round leaves of dark green color. The leaf morphology is of interest to spinach breeders. A significant share of the market of cultivated spinach is the early harvested baby leaf spinach. For spinach growers it is important that the leaves stand straight up which facilitates easy harvest, dark green colour is desired.

Spinach originates from middle Asia but it is now produced all over the world. Traditional areas where spinach was grown as a crop are Europe and Northern America, however contemporarily the biggest volume of spinach is produced in China. Spinach is produced for the food processing industry (canned or frozen spinach) as well as for the fresh market, where especially baby leaf spinach is in demand. Breeders develop lines with characteristics best suited for the location or the purpose.

An important development in the production and sales of fresh spinach was the introduction of bagged spinach. For this application the desired leaf morphology is such that the leaves are not too closely packed together that are found in the partly savoyed types.

Basic types of spinach are on the market:

-   -   A savoy type with dark green, curly and crinkly leaves (for the         fresh market);     -   A flat, or smooth, leaf spinach with broad, smooth leaves that         can be cleaned easily. This type is used for industry (canned or         frozen spinach, as well as processed food and baby food;     -   Semi savoy is an intermediate type of spinach with a comparable         texture as the savoy type but easy to clean as the smooth type         of spinach. It is cultivated both for fresh market and industry.     -   An oriental type which is heat tolerant, has long petioles,         pointed leaves with several side lobes and as plant has an         upright growth.

Most spinach is produced at high plant density for fresh market production which creates the ideal environment for disease development. Additionally, there is an increasing demand to produce organic vegetables. Consumers are looking for vegetables that are obtained without the use of pesticides, fungicides, insecticides and without chemical treatment of the seed. The challenge here is that such production conditions often lead to the development of plant disease. This creates a need for spinach cultivars that encompass natural, genetically encoded resistance against pathogens.

The most common pathogens causing diseases of spinach are Peronospora, Fusarium, Stemphyllium, Colletotrichum, Cercospora and Cucumber Mosaic Virus. The most important disease in spinach is downy mildew caused by the oomycete pathogen Peronospora effusa (=P. farinosa f. sp. spinaciae [hereafter Pfs]). The short lifecycle of Pfs results in rapid multiplication of the pathogen on susceptible cultivars. At first, small pale yellow irregular spots appear on the upper surface of the leafs and a purple downy growth on the lower surface of the spots. Spores develop on the leaves 9-12 days after first infection and are spread by wind and splashes of water. Infected leafs are no longer attractive for consumption and prone to other, secondary (microbial) infections.

One way to combat downy mildew is to spray the plants with fungicide. This approach is highly undesirable due to its heavy impact on the environment and because it is cost and labour intense. Moreover, half of the agriculturally produced spinach is meant for the organic market and this approach is not suitable for this application. There is thus a strong need in the field for spinach with resistance against the pathogen.

Peronospora farinosa is a pathogen that rapidly overcomes resistance. Within 2 to 3 years newly introduced resistance genes can be broken by the pathogen and therefore there is a constant demand to identify new resistance sources. Seventeen official races have been described by the International Working group on Peronospora effusa/farinosa/Pfs (IWGP). Since only a limited set of Resistance to Peronospora (RPF) genes have been described that originate from S. oleracea, wild relatives are a potential interesting source of novel and alternative RPF genes.

Spinacia tetrandra and Spinacia turkestanica are wild relatives of the contemporary spinach. It is possible to cross Spinacia oleracea with these wild relatives and as such they can be important sources of genetically encoded resistance to plant pathogens. Morphologically they resemble ancient spinach Spinacia oleracea. They are also either male or female with pointy leaves with sharp angles.

Considering the above, there is a need in the art for novel resistance sources providing resistance to downy mildew.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is an object of present invention to provide a solution for the above problems and needs of the art.

This object of the present invention, amongst other objects, is met as outlined in the appended claims.

Specifically, this object of the present invention, amongst other objects is met, according to a first aspect of the present invention by spinach plants being resistant to downy mildew, wherein the spinach plants comprise a downy mildew resistance providing genomic fragment from Spinacia tetrandra.

The present inventors have surprisingly discovered that a resistance in a wild relative of spinach could be successfully transferred to commercial spinach plants thereby providing downy mildew resistance to these plants.

According to a preferred embodiment, the present invention relates to spinach plants, wherein the genomic fragment from Spinacia tetrandra is located on chromosome 4 of the spinach plant.

According to another preferred embodiment, the present invention relates to a spinach plant, wherein the genomic fragment from Spinacia tetrandra is obtainable, or obtained, from a plant, representative seeds thereof have been deposited on 4 Apr. 2019 under deposit number NCIMB 43379 (National Collection of Industrial Food and Marine Bacteria, Ferguson Building, Craibstone Estate, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB21 9YA, UK).

According to an especially preferred embodiment, the present spinach plants comprise in their genomes a genomic fragment from Spinacia tetrandra, the genomic fragment comprises one or more nucleic acid sequences selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 3, SEQ ID No. 5, SEQ ID No. 7, SEQ ID No. 9, SEQ ID No. 11, SEQ ID No. 13, SEQ ID No. 15, SEQ ID No. 17, SEQ ID No. 19, SEQ ID No. 21, SEQ ID No. 23, SEQ ID No. 25, SEQ ID No. 27, SEQ ID No. 29, SEQ ID No. 31, SEQ ID No. 33 and SEQ ID No. 35.

According to another especially preferred embodiment, the present spinach plants do not comprise in their genomes a genomic fragment comprising one or more nucleic acid sequences selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID No. 2, SEQ ID No. 4, SEQ ID No. 6, SEQ ID No. 8, SEQ ID No. 10, SEQ ID No. 12, SEQ ID No. 14, SEQ ID No. 16, SEQ ID No. 18, SEQ ID No. 20, SEQ ID No. 22, SEQ ID No. 24, SEQ ID No. 26, SEQ ID No. 28, SEQ ID No. 30, SEQ ID No. 32, SEQ ID No. 34 and SEQ ID No. 36.

The present spinach plants preferably are hybrids or inbred plants.

According to the present invention, the present spinach plants are preferably Spinacia oleracea plants.

According to a second aspect, the present invention relates to seeds, edible parts, pollen, egg cells, callus, suspension culture, somatic embryos, embryos or plant parts of the spinach plants defined above comprising a downy mildew resistance providing genomic fragment from Spinacia tetrandra.

According to a third aspect, the present invention relates to methods for identifying a spinach plant being resistant to downy mildew, the method comprises the step of establishing the presence of a genomic fragment comprising one or more nucleic acid sequences selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 3, SEQ ID No. 5, SEQ ID No. 7, SEQ ID No. 9, SEQ ID No. 11, SEQ ID No. 13, SEQ ID No. 15, SEQ ID No. 17, SEQ ID No. 19, SEQ ID No. 21, SEQ ID No. 23, SEQ ID No. 25, SEQ ID No. 27, SEQ ID No. 29, SEQ ID No. 31, SEQ ID No. 33 and SEQ ID No. 35 in the genome of the spinach plant.

According to a fourth aspect, the present invention relates to the use of one or more genomic DNA sequences selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 3, SEQ ID No. 5, SEQ ID No. 7, SEQ ID No. 9, SEQ ID No. 11, SEQ ID No. 13, SEQ ID No. 15, SEQ ID No. 17, SEQ ID No. 19, SEQ ID No. 21, SEQ ID No. 23, SEQ ID No. 25, SEQ ID No. 27, SEQ ID No. 29, SEQ ID No. 31, SEQ ID No. 33 and SEQ ID No. 35. for identifying or providing a spinach plant being resistant to downy mildew.

According to a fifth aspect, the present invention relates to methods for providing the present spinach plant being resistant to downy mildew, wherein the methods comprise introgressing a downy mildew resistance providing genomic fragment from Spinacia tetrandra into a spinach plant.

According to a sixth aspect, the present invention relates to nucleic acid sequences selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 3, SEQ ID No. 5, SEQ ID No. 7, SEQ ID No. 9, SEQ ID No. 11, SEQ ID No. 13, SEQ ID No. 15, SEQ ID No. 17, SEQ ID No. 19, SEQ ID No. 21, SEQ ID No. 23, SEQ ID No. 25, SEQ ID No. 27, SEQ ID No. 29, SEQ ID No. 31, SEQ ID No. 33 and SEQ ID No. 35.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention is detailed in the following examples and figures wherein:

FIG. 1: shows a representative microscopy image of P. farinosa f. sp. spinaciae;

FIG. 2: shows a representative photograph of leaves of spinach plants infected with the downy mildew causative pathogen Peronospora farinose;

FIG. 3: shows a representative photograph of a spinach plant resistant to downy mildew.

DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Examples Example 1. Breeding Scheme: Introducing S. tetrandra Resistance Against Downy Mildew into S. oleracea

Initially, individual Spinacia tetrandra plants from CGN number CGN120251 were crossed with Blight A (S. oleracea). The latter is a female line which does not harbor any downy mildew resistance and therefore resistance in the offspring has to originate from the Spinacia tetrandra source. Blight A is an agriculturally elite line with round and dark leaves as its characteristics.

Result F1: Blight A×CGN120251.

Subsequently, downy mildew tests were performed with different races on the S. tetrandra-S. oleracea hybrids. Per hybrid population, resistant and vital plants were put together in a pollen-tight bag with Blight A. The hybrid-plants were female and therefore it was necessary to wait for the pollen production of Blight A. In this generation Blight A was used as a father instead of being used as a mother. The seeds were harvested in bulk from the hybrid plants.

Result BC1: Blight A(2)×CGN120251

The seeds harvested from the hybrid were prickly. At first, the BC1 seeds did not germinate at all even when the embryos were grown in vitro. To overcome the dormancy the seeds were first incubated at 4° C. Hereafter, the pots were kept at 20° C. and the seeds were germinating. Subsequently, a Pfs race 11 downy mildew disease test was performed on the plants. The resistant plants were selected and individually crossed with Blight C (S. Oleracea). Blight C is a male line that also lacks mildew resistance.

Result BC2: (Blight A(2)×CGN120251)×Blight C

To continue backcrossing, BC2 seed lots were selected on seed smoothness and yield. On the selected BC2 lots, another Pfs race 11 downy mildew test was performed. Resistant plants were selected and after that genotyped. Plants with highest resemblance to Spinacia oleracea (originating from Blight A or C) were selected. These plants were individually crossed with Blight A or C depending on the flowering behaviour of the BC2. In this example Blight C was used in this cross. Seeds were harvested from the backcross plant.

Result BC3: (Blight A(2)×CGN120251)×Blight C(2)

A Pfs strain 11 downy mildew test was performed on the BC3 plants. Resistant plants were genotyped to be able to select plants with the highest resemblance with S. oleracea. Selected plants were selfed.

Result BC3S1: ((Blight A(2)×CGN120251)×Blight C(2)) S1 Example 2. Description of Spinach Downy Mildew—Peronospora farinosa—Disease Trial

Resistance to Peronospora farinosa f. sp. spinaciae (synonym P. effusa [hereafter Pfs]) is tested in a qualitative disease assay. In short, 10 to 14 days after untreated seed is sown in soil, a minimum of 8 plants is inoculated with a spore suspension of a single Pfs race or isolate. Pfs is maintained on a living susceptible host plant e.g. Viroflay or Blight or plant material with spores is stored for a maximum of 1 year at −20° C. Inoculated plants are incubated under plastic at high humidity (80-100%) and at a temperature ranging from 16° C.-20° C. After 24 hours plastic is removed, plants are assessed at 9 to 12 days after inoculation. When sporulation is observed on the cotyledons or true leaves a plant is considered susceptible and when no sporulation is observed a plant is considered resistant.

A differential set as described in Table 1 is included in each disease trial under the same environmental conditions to confirm the race. This differential set for Pfs was developed by the International Working Group on Peronospora farinosa (IWGP) and can be found on the website of the International Seed Federation (ISF). This differential set that consists of spinach varieties and near-isogenic lines (NILs) is used to determine the Pfs race. In this table “−” indicates resistance (no sporulation), “+” indicates susceptibility (sporulation), “(−)” indicates intermediate resistance (sparse sporulation on the tips of cotyledons), “n.t.” indicates that the current strain was not tested. Seeds of this differential set and Pfs races can be obtained at Naktuinbouw (P.O. Box 40, NL-2370 AA, Roelofarendsveen, Netherlands, naktuinbouw.com).

TABLE 1 IWGP Spinach differential set for Pfs. Where “−” is resistant, “+” is susceptible and “(−)” indicates intermediate resistance. Race Pfs Variety/NIL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Viroflay + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + NIL5 − − + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + NIL3 − + − + − + + − − + − − + − + − + NIL4 − − − − + + + + + + + + + + − + + NIL6 − + − − − + − + + + − + (−) + − − + NIL1 − − − − − − − + − + − + − + − − + NIL2 − − − − − − − − − − + + + + − + + Whale − − − (−) − (−) (−) − − (−) − − + − (−) − + Pigeon − − − − − − − − − − − − − + − + + Caladonia − − − − − − − − − − − − − − + − + Meerkat − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − + (−) Hydrus − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − −

TABLE 2 Resistance pattern of deposit NCIMB 43379. Where “−” is resistant and “+” is susceptible and “n.t.” is not tested. Race Pfs Variety 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Deposit 43379 n.t. n.t. n.t. − n.t. n.t. − n.t. − − − − − − − − −

Example 3. Novel Resistance Against Downy Mildew from Spinacia tetrandra-Marker Development

In the BC2 population derived from S. oleracea and S. tetrandra crosses 56 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) informative between both parents were used to genotype the population. The 56 SNPs were distributed across all six chromosomes. A correlation was found between the disease score and a SNP on chromosome 4 (Table 3). The correlation was not absolute, showing the identified SNP did not fully segregate with the resistance.

TABLE 3 Number of plants showing correlation between disease scores and the genotype of a SNP in a BC2 population derived from S. oleracea and S. tetrandra. SNP* SNP* heterozygous homozygous (S. oleracea and Disease score Pfs11 (S. oleracea) S. tetrandra) Resistant 6 16 Susceptible 20 2 *chromosome 4 position 11,627,232 bp.

The genomic region identified in the BC2 was genotyped for additional SNPs informative between both original parents. Resistant plants, heterozygous for the identified SNP, were selected and used to create BC3 populations. One BC3 population was challenged with several downy mildew isolates. A genomic region close to the SNP identified in the BC2 population segregated well with the disease scores (Table 4).

TABLE 4 Number of plants showing correlation between disease scores and the genotype of a genomic region in a BC3 population derived from S. oleracea and S. tetrandra. Downy Resistant Susceptible mildew homozygous homozygous Resistant Susceptible isolate S. oleracea* S. oleracea* heterozygous* Heterozygous* Pf4 1 7 9 0 Pf7 0 7 12 0 Pf9 0 5 11 0 Pf10 0 8 7 0 Pf12 0 7 9 0 Pf13 0 10 9 0 Pf14 0 11 7 0 Pf15 0 12 7 0 Pf16 0 10 6 0 Pf17 0 11 4 0 Total 1 88 81 0 *at identified genomic region.

The region co-segregating with the novel resistance from S. tetrandra is located on chromosome 4 between 8.0 and 8.9 Mbp and can be identified with several nucleotide sequences (Table 5). Abbreviations are according to IUPAC Nucleotide code.

TABLE 5 SNPsfor the detection of the resistance against Peronospora farinosa Position Position Allele linked Alternative SNP Chromosome Chromosome* (bp) Scaffold Scaffold (bp) to resistance allele 1 chr4 8,104,487 000037 700,416 T A 2 chr4 8,204,126 000037 800,055 G A 3 chr4 8,305,539 000037 901,468 A T 4 chr4 8,500,200 000037 1,096,129 C T 5 chr4 8,502,319 000037 1,098,248 A C 6 chr4 8,502,334 000037 1,098,263 A G 7 chr4 8,502,394 000037 1,098,323 A G 8 chr4 8,508,716 000037 1,104,645 G C 9 chr4 8,508,834 000037 1,104,763 A G 10 chr4 8,508,984 000037 1,104,913 T C 11 chr4 8,508,996 000037 1,104,925 C T 12 chr4 8,509,556 000037 1,105,485 T A 13 chr4 8,509,737 000037 1,105,666 T C 14 chr4 8,510,680 000037 1,106,609 T G 15 chr4 8,510,715 000037 1,106,644 G C 16 chr4 8,510,919 000037 1,106,848 C G 17 chr4 8,510,962 000037 1,106,891 C T 18 chr4 8,804,303 000037 1,400,232 C G *The reference genome is : Xu, C., et al., Draft genome of spinach and transcriptome diversity of 120 Spinacia accessions, Nature Communications 2017.

Genetic position* SEQ ID on Chr 4 Sequence No. (bp) -SNP nucleotide is highlighted bold and in brackets SEQ ID 8,104,487 AGGGAATACTGGATTGTTGGAAGCGTATAAATTGTCAAGGMCCACAACAA[T] No. 1 TATATGCCCACGAAAATAAACGCAAAAGTGATAACTGAATACTTTTCTAC SEQ ID 8,104,487 AGGGAATACTGGATTGTTGGAAGCGTATAAATTGTCAAGGMCCACAACAA[A] No. 2 TATATGCCCACGAAAATAAACGCAAAAGTGATAACTGAATACTTTTCTAC SEQ ID 8,204,126 ATTCAAATCCAAATCAAATCCAGAAAAATTCAAAAAAAAAATACAAAATC[G] No. 3 ACGCAGAAAACTTACAGAGAATGTCGCCGACGATTGACGCTGAAAATGCG SEQ ID 8,204,126 ATTCAAATCCAAATCAAATCCAGAAAAATTCAAAAAAAAAATACAAAATC[A] No. 4 ACGCAGAAAACTTACAGAGAATGTCGCCGACGATTGACGCTGAAAATGCG SEQ ID 8,305,539 ATTTCTACCTTTTTTACGTACCACAATTCCACAAACTTGTGTATTTATAT[A] No. 5 AACACTTTGGTCACACATTTCAACTACATTATTGCATTTCATTTCAATAY SEQ ID 8,305,539 ATTTCTACCTTTTTTACGTACCACAATTCCACAAACTTGTGTATTTATAT[T] No. 6 AACACTTTGGTCACACATTTCAACTACATTATTGCATTTCATTTCAATAY SEQ ID 8,500,200 AGTTTTCTCACCTGAGCTCTGATGATAGCACTTTTCTTGTCTTGCTCAGC[C] No. 7 TTTTCCACAATAAACTTGGCTCTTTCAGCATCTTGTGCAGCTACCTGTTT SEQ ID 8,500,200 AGTTTTCTCACCTGAGCTCTGATGATAGCACTTTTCTTGTCTTGCTCAGC[T] No. 8 TTTTCCACAATAAACTTGGCTCTTTCAGCATCTTGTGCAGCTACCTGTTT SEQ ID 8,502,319 TCCTTGATACCAGAGATGCGGTTGAAGACGATAGCTCGATGACCACCTTC[A] No. 9 ACATTGTACATACTRTGACTGACTCCATAAGCGGCAAGGCCAAGAGCACC SEQ ID 8,502,319 TCCTTGATACCAGAGATGCGGTTGAAGACGATAGCTCGATGACCACCTTC[C] No. 10 ACATTGTACATACTRTGACTGACTCCATAAGCGGCAAGGCCAAGAGCACC SEQ ID 8,502,334 ATGCGGTTGAAGACGATAGCTCGATGACCACCTTCMACATTGTACATACT[A] No. 11 TGACTGACTCCATAAGCGGCAAGGCCAAGAGCACCAAGAATTCCAACCTT SEQ ID 8,502,334 ATGCGGTTGAAGACGATAGCTCGATGACCACCTTCMACATTGTACATACT[G] No. 12 TGACTGACTCCATAAGCGGCAAGGCCAAGAGCACCAAGAATTCCAACCTT SEQ ID 8,502,394 CCATAAGCGGCAAGGCCAAGAGCACCAAGAATTCCAACCTTAACCARATT[A] No. 13 GCAGCAGCGCCACCGCCGCCACCAGGCATCTTGGGAACCTTAACGTTTTG SEQ ID 8,502,394 CCATAAGCGGCAAGGCCAAGAGCACCAAGAATTCCAACCTTAACCARATT[G] No. 14 GCAGCAGCGCCACCGCCGCCACCAGGCATCTTGGGAACCTTAACGTTTTG SEQ ID 8,508,716 AGATTTCTGATTTCCTGTAGTTGGGAGTTTGATTCTTCCAGTTTCGGACA[G] No. 15 AGAGGAAAATTTCTCAAATTATCACAAAATGTAATTAACAGATGAGAAAG SEQ ID 8,508,716 AGATTTCTGATTTCCTGTAGTTGGGAGTTTGATTCTTCCAGTTTCGGACA[C] No. 16 AGAGGAAAATTTCTCAAATTATCACAAAATGTAATTAACAGATGAGAAAG SEQ ID 8,508,834 AATGTGWTTGAAACCCTGCTACTTCTCGTGTCTCACCCATATCTGATTCT[A] No. 17 ATTTCCACCATCCTTCCAACTTTGGCATACTCCAAAGCTCAAGCTTTTCA SEQ ID 8,508,834 AATGTGWTTGAAACCCTGCTACTTCTCGTGTCTCACCCATATCTGATTCT[G] No. 18 ATTTCCACCATCCTTCCAACTTTGGCATACTCCAAAGCTCAAGCTTTTCA SEQ ID 8,508,984 CTCCTGATGTTGATGCAACCCCTTCTGCGCTGATAGTACTATTCTCCATA[T] No. 19 ACACCACTTCAYTCAAATATCGTAATGTAAGGAATTTCAAATGACGCAGT SEQ ID 8,508,984 CTCCTGATGTTGATGCAACCCCTTCTGCGCTGATAGTACTATTCTCCATA[C] No. 20 ACACCACTTCAYTCAAATATCGTAATGTAAGGAATTTCAAATGACGCAGT SEQ ID 8,508,996 ATGCAACCCCTTCTGCGCTGATAGTACTATTCTCCATAYACACCACTTCA[C] No. 21 TCAAATATCGTAATGTAAGGAATTTCAAATGACGCAGTTGACTCATCAAT SEQ ID 8,508,996 ATGCAACCCCTTCTGCGCTGATAGTACTATTCTCCATAYACACCACTTCA[T] No. 22 TCAAATATCGTAATGTAAGGAATTTCAAATGACGCAGTTGACTCATCAAT SEQ ID 8,509,556 GGCATATGYGACAAACTCTTACAGCCTTGTATATCTAGGTGCCTTAGATT[T] No. 23 ACTAATTTCCTCAAATCGCTTGGCAAAGTTTTTAGACCACGACACTCACG SEQ ID 8,509,556 GGCATATGYGACAAACTCTTACAGCCTTGTATATCTAGGTGCCTTAGATT[A] No. 24 ACTAATTTCCTCAAATCGCTTGGCAAAGTTTTTAGACCACGACACTCACG SEQ ID 8,509,737 GATATCTTAGATGCAACAAGTTACCTATCTCACTCGGCAACATTTCCAAA[T] No. 25 CAGAGTTATTCAAGCTTAAGACCCTTAAATATTCCACTTTTGATAACAAA SEQ ID 8,509,737 GATATCTTAGATGCAACAAGTTACCTATCTCACTCGGCAACATTTCCAAA[C] No. 26 CAGAGTTATTCAAGCTTAAGACCCTTAAATATTCCACTTTTGATAACAAA SEQ ID 8,510,680 TACATCATCCAAAACAAGGAGGTATATCTTCCCATCCAGTTCGTCCCGAA[T] No. 27 TTTCATCTGAAGCTGGTCCATACTCATACTCAGGSCATCGTGCTTTCTTC SEQ ID 8,510,680 TACATCATCCAAAACAAGGAGGTATATCTTCCCATCCAGTTCGTCCCGAA[G] No. 28 TTTCATCTGAAGCTGGTCCATACTCATACTCAGGSCATCGTGCTTTCTTC SEQ ID 8,510,715 CCAGTTCGTCCCGAAKTTTCATCTGAAGCTGGTCCATACTCATACTCAGG[G] No. 29 CATCGTGCTTTCTTCTAGGGTTTACGGCTGCAAGGATTTCAGCAACAAGA SEQ ID 8,510,715 CCAGTTCGTCCCGAAKTTTCATCTGAAGCTGGTCCATACTCATACTCAGG[C] No. 30 CATCGTGCTTTCTTCTAGGGTTTACGGCTGCAAGGATTTCAGCAACAAGA SEQ ID 8,510,919 CCAGCCCCCCAATCCCCACTATGCTGACAACAGAAATATCCTTCTCCTCA[C] No. 31 AAGAAGTGTTTAGTACCATATCTATCACTTTCCGCTTGTCATYATCCCTC SEQ ID 8,510,919 CCAGCCCCCCAATCCCCACTATGCTGACAACAGAAATATCCTTCTCCTCA[G] No. 32 AAGAAGTGTTTAGTACCATATCTATCACTTTCCGCTTGTCATYATCCCTC SEQ ID 8,510,962 CTCCTCASAAGAAGTGTTTAGTACCATATCTATCACTTTCCGCTTGTCAT[C] No. 33 ATCCCTCCCAATGATCATATCTTCCTCGCAAACAAAGGAATGAGTTTCCC SEQ ID 8,510,962 CTCCTCASAAGAAGTGTTTAGTACCATATCTATCACTTTCCGCTTGTCAT[T] No. 34 ATCCCTCCCAATGATCATATCTTCCTCGCAAACAAAGGAATGAGTTTCCC SEQ ID 8,804,303 TAATTGATGATTTGAAGATTTATTACTACAACRCAATGGATTTTGTTTTG[C] No. 35 AATTATGCATTAAGAAGAGACTCRCATTTTTCATATTGGTGTATGGTAGT SEQ ID 8,804,303 TAATTGATGATTTGAAGATTTATTACTACAACRCAATGGATTTTGTTTTG[G] No. 36 AATTATGCATTAAGAAGAGACTCRCATTTTTCATATTGGTGTATGGTAGT *The reference genome is Xu, C., et al., Draft genome of spinach and transcriptome diversity of 120 Spinacia accessions, Nature Communications 2017. Odd sequences = linked to resistance, Even sequences = alternative allele. 

1. A spinach plant being resistant to downy mildew, wherein the spinach plant comprises a downy mildew resistance providing genomic fragment from Spinacia tetrandra.
 2. The spinach plant according to claim 1, wherein the genomic fragment from Spinacia tetrandra is located on chromosome 4 of the spinach plant.
 3. The spinach plant according to claim 1, wherein the genomic fragment from Spinacia tetrandra is obtainable, or obtained, from a plant, representative seeds thereof have been deposited under deposit number NCIMB
 43379. 4. The spinach plant according to claim 1, wherein the spinach plant comprises in its genome a genomic fragment from Spinacia tetrandra, the genomic fragment comprises one or more nucleic acid sequences selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 3, SEQ ID No. 5, SEQ ID No. 7, SEQ ID No. 9, SEQ ID No. 11, SEQ ID No. 13, SEQ ID No. 15, SEQ ID No. 17, SEQ ID No. 19, SEQ ID No. 21, SEQ ID No. 23, SEQ ID No. 25, SEQ ID No. 27, SEQ ID No. 29, SEQ ID No. 31, SEQ ID No. 33 and SEQ ID No.
 35. 5. The spinach plant according to claim 1, wherein the spinach plant not comprises in its genome a genomic fragment comprising one or more nucleic acid sequences selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID No. 2, SEQ ID No. 4, SEQ ID No. 6, SEQ ID No. 8, SEQ ID No. 10, SEQ ID No. 12, SEQ ID No. 14, SEQ ID No. 16, SEQ ID No. 18, SEQ ID No. 20, SEQ ID No. 22, SEQ ID No. 24, SEQ ID No. 26, SEQ ID No. 28, SEQ ID No. 30, SEQ ID No. 32, SEQ ID No. 34 and SEQ ID No.
 36. 6. The spinach plant according to claim 1, wherein the spinach plant is a hybrid plant.
 7. The spinach plant according to claim 1, wherein the spinach plant is an inbred plant.
 8. The spinach plant according to claim 1, wherein the spinach plant is Spinacia oleracea.
 9. A seed, edible parts, pollen, egg cells, callus, suspension culture, somatic embryos, embryos or plant parts of a spinach plant according to claim 1, comprising a downy mildew resistance providing genomic fragment from Spinacia tetrandra
 10. A method for identifying a spinach plant being resistant to downy mildew, the method comprises the step of establishing the presence of a genomic fragment comprising one or more nucleic acid sequences selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 3, SEQ ID No. 5, SEQ ID No. 7, SEQ ID No. 9, SEQ ID No. 11, SEQ ID No. 13, SEQ ID No. 15, SEQ ID No. 17, SEQ ID No. 19, SEQ ID No. 21, SEQ ID No. 23, SEQ ID No. 25, SEQ ID No. 27, SEQ ID No. 29, SEQ ID No. 31, SEQ ID No. 33, and SEQ ID No. 35 in the genome of the spinach plant.
 11. (canceled)
 12. A method for providing spinach plant being resistant to downy mildew comprising introgressing a downy mildew resistance providing genomic fragment from Spinacia tetrandra into a spinach plant.
 13. (canceled) 